![]() |
Home > Nuclear Safety > Committee on Nuclear Regulatory Activities >
The Transparency of Nuclear Regulatory ActivitiesTokyo and Tokai-Mura, Japan, 22-24 May 2007Organised in collaboration with the Japan Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency and the Japan Nuclear Energy Safety Organisation The NEA Committee on Nuclear Regulatory Activities (CNRA) Working Group on Public Communication of nuclear regulatory organisations (WGPC) held a workshop on the transparency of nuclear regulatory activities in collaboration with the Japan Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency (NISA) and the Japan Nuclear Energy Safety Organisation (JNES). The workshop was held on 22-24 May 2007 in Tokyo, Japan and included an interaction session with local stakeholders in Tokai Mura on the last day. The main purpose of the workshop was to provide the staff of nuclear regulatory organisations responsible for public communication with the opportunity to share information, practices and experiences and to discuss developments, progress and techniques in the area of nuclear regulatory communication with the public. Particular emphasis was put on the transparency of nuclear regulatory activities. The objectives of the workshop were as follows:
In addition to sharing practices and experience, the workshop contributed to the identification of important public communication issues for nuclear regulatory organisation. The results of the workshop will be documented in a proceedings, which will include a summary and conclusions. These proceedings can be used by member countries in the context of their regulatory responsibility. The proceedings will also serve as a valuable reference in this field. BackgroundA first workshop was held in Paris, in December 2000, which addressed the prerequisites for a nuclear regulator to develop and maintain the confidence of the public in its activities. The main outcomes of this workshop can be summarised as follows:
This latter observation was one of the main reasons for the CNRA creating the WGPC. The WGPC organised a second workshop in Ottawa in May 2004 which addressed the possible ways for building, measuring and improving public confidence in the regulator. Although it was found that cultural differences between the countries are large, and that similar means for communication are not effective everywhere, a number of common principles were identified that can be recommended to all regulators. Among these were the following:
Related links
Last updated: 13 December, 2007 | |
Home - About Us - Work Areas - Data Bank - Publications - Press Room - List of acronyms - Search